Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Natalie Cornell's avatar

Jess Piper (View from Rural Missouri) addressed this issue - and continues to - about whether rural voters vote "against their interests". Her take is that since Howard Dean left the job of head of the DNC, Democrats haven't had a 50 system strategy. In most "red states" the Democats don't even field candidates and when they do, the national party provides no support. As a result, in most counties/districts, people can't vote for Democrats because they aren't actually on the ballot.

Now that doesn't address presidential elections, but what would make a person vote for a Democratic nominee for President, when they haven't been on a local ballot in years? Hard to think Dems are going to help from DC.

As you have pointed out, there's alot of nuance in elections that FAFO doesn't come close to addressing.

Expand full comment
Michele Pfannenstiel DVM's avatar

Having lived in a lot of different places... I agree with you.. at the presidential level.

I really think the reason that we lost Appalachia is because of local. Many Dems in many rural places were AWFUL.

Then the GOP came courting and acted during the run up to the election as if they had the best interests of the locals population and to be sure... some dud.

And then, frankly.. the Dems left. We ceded the airwaves to Sinclair, we only looked to "winnable " districts and bet the whole world on CA and NY.

I think it is much more that the Dem consultant class decided that they didn't need Appalachia to win. And... they were wrong. Deeply unforgivingly wrong. It was the Dem body politic that worked against its own best interest. And now... here we are.

Expand full comment
17 more comments...

No posts