Discussion about this post

User's avatar
Zachary Allman's avatar

Although I agree with the sentiment and goal of the author's thesis, I have two questions:

1. Does the red-blue label cause division? Or does it just represent existing division?

2. How does one abolish this? However unfortunate, these labels capture an existing divide in this country.

As a tribal species, we seem to be incapable of not fracturing into divisions of us and them. Threats -- real or created -- serve to exacerbate tribal behavior. Perhaps instead of trying to abolish the red state-blue state label, we might be more successful if the liberals of Morgantown sat down over beer and pizza with the conservatives of Mingo County. Reductive labels tend to lose their significance when one is confronted with a living, breathing human.

Such siloed lives we lead.

Expand full comment
TA Inskeep's avatar

Agree with this so hard. Especially since last year's election, I keep telling people that the red state/blue state binary is far too reductive, citing things like Pikeville (KY) Pride's almost 3000-person attendance last year, in addition to Gov Beshear's popularity in the state. No state is a monolith! Gerrymandering (in both directions, to be fair) has ruined the democratic process in most states, leaving good people unable to make much electoral change.

Expand full comment
8 more comments...

No posts